Caught Red-Cup Handed
Riley Kimball
Oxy's alcohol policy states that "open containers [. . .] imply consumption." This means that open beer cans, handles, flasks or any other vessel for alcohol function as incriminating evidence of drinking. Oxy students understand and generally respect these rules (or do their best to escape notice of breaking them). Of late, however, a new twist in this policy has students writhing: the inclusion of red, Solo-brand cups as containers for alcohol. Under this tacit evolution of the policy, underage students can be written up for having red cups in hand. While many oppose this new rule, it is both logically founded and true to the goal of the alcohol policy.
The new policy is founded on the deep connections between alcohol and red Solo cups. Plenty of evidence suggests this subconscious association. Red cups in a picture on Facebook clearly denote a party. Some will deny this correlation, but anyone hesitant of posting photos of drinking de-tags pictures framing beer cans and red cups with equal haste. The modern prevalence of beer pong (or Beirut) at parties has helped to solidify the bond between red cups and alcohol.
Students complain that red cups do not necessarily indicate the presence of alcohol. This is true, insofar as the association between alcohol and these cups is not concrete; they are, in fact, capable of containing other drinks. Such cups are popular for being disposable. However, as adults, when these cups are used at birthday parties, they generally don't contain soda. Is it so unjust, then, to assume that, at least in college, red cups contain alcohol?
A logical look at the circumstances reveals the justice of the new policy. In college, most, if not all, red cups house alcohol of some sort. Alcohol consumption by minors is both illegal and unsupported by Oxy. Therefore, the use of red cups indicates illicit goings-on, which Oxy is bound by policy and law to prevent.
Students may consider the case hopeless, but this is only for a lack of tact. The entrenched association exists only between alcohol and red, Solo-brand cups. This provides a few simple measures that can be taken to escape prosecution and writing-up. Cups of myriad brands are available for purchase as nearby as Super A Foods or Target. Dixie-brand and paper cups are two such easy alternatives. And for true purists only content with plastic cups of deep hues and moderate washability, even Solo makes cups in different colors.
To be sure, Oxy's alcohol policy can encroach on an evening. However, the rules make sense: an R.A. cannot be expected to play dumb while watching students set up red cups in a triangle formation on a long table. While alterations and modifications of the regulations may seem harsh, students of a selective school like Oxy should be able to stay one step ahead. The red cup policy, therefore, is not so much a bane as a necessary measure for alcohol regulation.
Riley Kimball is an undeclared first-year. He can be reached at kimball@oxy.edu.

Viewing Comments 1 - 7 of 7
Reader McGee
posted 11/12/08 @ 2:30 PM PST
This article is dull, logically incoherent, and stands as an example of why people dislike our newspaper. The purpose of including this article in the paper is clear: fill up space. (Continued…)
Gerry Maravilla
posted 11/13/08 @ 12:49 AM PST
If you have a complaint about the paper, make it constructive and for the love of God use your real name.
I don't think I have to do a facebook search to see that "Reader McGee" is not a real person. (Continued…)
Reader McGee
posted 11/13/08 @ 2:04 PM PST
Firstly, my bashing is far from "passive aggressive". And I believe this is "speaking up". I would use a real name, if it weren't for the obvious offense writers like yourself take to any criticism of your paper which doesn't end in ". (Continued…)
Gerry Maravilla
posted 11/13/08 @ 7:36 PM PST
You are complaining and whining, a far cry from "speaking up".
You offer no constructive criticism to the writer or the publication itself, you merely tear it down like a hapless teenager trying to make someone feel bad about himself. (Continued…)
Greg Kineer
posted 11/14/08 @ 1:26 PM PST
I don't know why you have yet to engage my comments about the actual article. Recognize when an article sucks. You have a right to print bad articles, but that sword cuts both ways; I have a right to criticize them, and if I disagree with the main points of the article, how would I be constructive? I presented a very detailed critique of an argument I feel passionately about, but if you think that is "complaining and whining", then I don't know what to tell you. (Continued…)
Gerry Maravilla
posted 11/16/08 @ 8:13 PM PST
The basic fact is that if you really cared and wanted to be
constructive you would have e-mailed the writer or the opinions
editors. Our identities are no secret. (Continued…)
The Author of What Is Clearly Filler
posted 11/19/08 @ 8:16 PM PST
Dear Reader,
I thank you for your involvement in the Weekly. I also appreciate Gerry's defense. There are some matters at hand that require my voice to be heard, so here I am. (Continued…)
Post a Comment